Trump Still Guilty Even If He Believed He Won?

Awesome, the opinion of Peter Zeidenberg, the guy who spent much of his career putting Bush Administration officials in jail.  Sure, one of his targets had his conviction overturned because of his unethical courtroom tactics, though the guy still ended up in jail via a process "crime."

Neat, good stuff.  Do you have anything from the NYT you'd like to throw in?

Every week there's a new crisis for us to focus on and analyze, to distract us from the big picture, the real endgame.  It's working.

This trial is no more than an extension of the J6 inquisition.  It's a kangaroo court designed to divide, weaken and conquer all those who believe in the Constitution, liberty and equal justice for all.  It's a scam.

The trial is in a location where it is virtually impossible for any non-progressive to get a fair trial and the judge is no different.  She has essentially been a hanging judge for the defendants of the manufactured insurrection and has been openly critical of the events of J6.  
From the same source, "Judge" Chutkan sentenced Matthew Mazzocco to 45 days in jail for a misdemeanor despite the prosecutor's recommendation of home confinement. (here).  According the the "judge":
The judge who denied a change of venue and that she recuse herself actually said that the riots in protest of the wrongful death of a career criminal - riots that resulted in $billions in property damage, death and injury - were "mostly peaceful"!  The peaceful protesters killed other people and the violent mob killed no one.  And this guy, Zeidenberg, is the deliverer of propaganda to suggest there is some validity to the allegations.

This trial is like having a play reviewed by fans of the home team.  The entire process of Trump destruction is that.  Everything they're prosecuting him for, criminalizing him for, has been done in recent history by THEM!  The legality or illegality is irrelevant.

And, no, I don't like him or want him elected again - unless the choice is him or Biden, or Newsome, or Clinton or Michelle Obama or any other America-hating communist intent on enslaving us all for their benefit.

The only thing that confuses me is why.  Their actions are strengthening his support and increasing his war chest.  They're making him stronger, more relevant.

Maybe you should start using Google, instead of citing communist hacks.  Yes, absolutely your past can make your statements invalid.  I don't need to read his "opinions."  I know who he is, and that's enough.  I made it far enough to where he compared criminals using that as their defense in any crime, "I honestly thought it wasn't a crime."  That plus his past invalidates everything he says.

I criticized Trump because he was the actual president, and didn't do anything he promised.  Now he's paying for it.  

I discounted one Federalist member lawyer, a card carrying Never Trumper.  I discounted another communist hack, who isn't a Federalist member.  Long ago I said The System won't allow him to be president ever again, and he won't even be on the ballot in many states.  He'll be declared ineligible, using a clause in the 14th Amendment that can be applied to any politician or citizen in the country, depending on who's in charge.  And look at what's starting to happen.....

I forget exactly what I wrote about Taibbi, but he's a career leftist hack who seemed shocked that The System treated him like a runaway slave for daring to expose that the Feds worked directly with Twitter to censor conservatives.  He gets no sympathy from me.  Enjoy it Matt.

The only thing resembling a strategy here is that DeSantis would likely gain broader support, and could actually win - or at least, make them have to cheat so blatantly over the top and obvious that it would cause major civil unrest.  I think Trump's support would actually be a little bit less than 2020.  

Past that, you're just watching committed communists do what they do.  Destroy, rinse, and repeat.

I'm not a jurist so I'm not sure how often the venue is changed as a means to have a fair trial. 
Link

That sounds like the sixth amendment guarantees a change of venue if the jury is prejudiced.  Did you just ignore that the judge is prejudiced?  Have you followed the timing of the trial?  I'm in favor of getting to the bottom of what he did and why he did it, but do that in a way that isn't so transparently prejudiced - like the J6 fiasco.  This is a set-up, Mike.

You're still skipping over the judge.  You don't think that's important?

I'd love to have a valid, honest way to keep him out of the election.  For all I know, that's his endgame, not ego.  A self-sacrifice to further expose the grip corruption and communism are exerting on us.  I doubt it, but that would be genius. 

It's unthinkable that a biased judge would be permitted to oversee a case.  A judge has a lot of influence/power in the courtroom, but winning isn't the goal here.  The election is the point, and influencing the voters is the intent.

I missed your point. What is his end game?

You know I strongly dislike Trump the person, but I hate the BS going on more. It would be Justice if he did as we hope and shove it up their ass. He would need to recruit a sale-able successor to “stick it to the man”.

It would be genius.