|
Post by birdwatcher on Sept 26, 2019 22:54:10 GMT -5
His first pick since 2016...how many has he missed along the way?
|
|
|
Post by rumply on Sept 26, 2019 22:59:16 GMT -5
haha, who would have thought the D wins it in the end.
Horrible for Maddox, hope the guy is ok. & 2 horrible passes by Wentz to end that last drive, they couldn't stop the run, what the hell are they thinking there?? Stupid playcalling & poor execution.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 26, 2019 23:23:30 GMT -5
Love it but he needs to take a knee in the end zone!
|
|
JeeQ
Veteran
Posts: 61
|
Post by JeeQ on Sept 26, 2019 23:32:28 GMT -5
Pedey discovered that we have the running back who was 3rd in the league on our roster
|
|
|
Post by dreagon on Sept 26, 2019 23:37:22 GMT -5
Pedey discovered that we have the running back who was 3rd in the league on our roster I just don't understand why he didn't use him on those last two offensive plays you guys had. That would have run a minute and a half off the clock instead of stopping it twice with those two incompletions. I actually found myself in the weird position of yelling at a division rivals coach to run the damn ball.
|
|
|
Post by rumply on Sept 27, 2019 0:19:27 GMT -5
Pedey discovered that we have the running back who was 3rd in the league on our roster I just don't understand why he didn't use him on those last two offensive plays you guys had. That would have run a minute and a half off the clock instead of stopping it twice with those two incompletions. I actually found myself in the weird position of yelling at a division rivals coach to run the damn ball. crazy play calling
|
|
|
Post by gadgetrick on Sept 27, 2019 4:56:54 GMT -5
Groh still has to go. Thankfully, they finally realized, "Oh! We have a good running back...or two...or three..." Run the damn ball!!!
Bradham missed what probably would have been a Pick 6 earlier in the game.
Was Jenkins on the field last night? Was watching in a bar so couldn't hear the announcers (thankfully).
Schwartz is an idiot. 3rd and long, he always plays the CBs off the receivers 8 yards. Then, ball snapped, they backpedal. Predictably, the receiver cuts under (while the CB is still backpedaling) and boom! First down.
What the hell happened to tackling? This defense looks horrible tackling. Can they tackle anyone cleanly when they DO actually tackle? Guys ALWAYS falling forward for 3-5 yards. WTF!!!??
Wentz needs to get out of this throwing the ball high early in the game. He's also been bad on throws to the outside. Otherwise, he's the friggin' man.
Jeffrey is a friggin' MAN. The guy was obviously, hurt last night but still helped the offense get on track. All the respect to that guy.
The playcalling on the last drive was just stupid. They'd run the ball for 170 yards. 2nd down, was moving the ball (running) and working to run the clock down, what do you do? Well, pass of course! Incomplete of course. Stops the clock. 3rd and long and, well, Wentz missed an easy throw for a first down. Punt the ball and give the defense one last chance to give up the lead.
Defense, again, let's them march down the field and it's looking bleak. Then we get lucky on a bounce thankfully.
Was nice seeing the offense finally wake up but another lost 1st quarter. Say it with me...Groh must goh!!! Groh must goh!!
I think it's obvious the NFL doesn't want to overturn PI calls. That was absolutely PI on us when GB challenged and it was definitely PI on GB when we challenged it. If you're going to have the ability to challenge, you have to overturn obvious calls like that. Otherwise, get rid of that challenge.
I'll take the win. Tough to win in GB any time.
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 27, 2019 9:41:26 GMT -5
Pedey discovered that we have the running back who was 3rd in the league on our roster I actually found myself in the weird position of yelling at a division rivals coach to run the damn ball. Welcome to Philly. If we used our running backs we'd have 5 rings too.
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 27, 2019 9:44:54 GMT -5
Schwartz is an idiot. 3rd and long, he always plays the CBs off the receivers 8 yards. Then, ball snapped, they backpedal. Predictably, the receiver cuts under (while the CB is still backpedaling) and boom! First down. I think it's obvious the NFL doesn't want to overturn PI calls. That was absolutely PI on us when GB challenged and it was definitely PI on GB when we challenged it. If you're going to have the ability to challenge, you have to overturn obvious calls like that. Otherwise, get rid of that challenge. -Our DB's suck, and Rodgers was carving them up all night. If Adams is on the field all night we probably don't win. He has to play them back to give them a chance to not get burned. If he played press coverage and constantly gave up 50 yard plays you'd be bitching about that. -This is what happens when Goodell and Co. reward whiny little bitches for bitching. Yes, the non-PI call in NO was atrocious. No, that doesn't mean we should change the entire game because whiny fans booed. I'm glad they aren't overturning PI. Just get rid of the damn rule change and tell Payton to fuck off.
|
|
|
Post by gadgetrick on Sept 27, 2019 19:00:16 GMT -5
Schwartz is an idiot. 3rd and long, he always plays the CBs off the receivers 8 yards. Then, ball snapped, they backpedal. Predictably, the receiver cuts under (while the CB is still backpedaling) and boom! First down. I think it's obvious the NFL doesn't want to overturn PI calls. That was absolutely PI on us when GB challenged and it was definitely PI on GB when we challenged it. If you're going to have the ability to challenge, you have to overturn obvious calls like that. Otherwise, get rid of that challenge. -Our DB's suck, and Rodgers was carving them up all night. If Adams is on the field all night we probably don't win. He has to play them back to give them a chance to not get burned. If he played press coverage and constantly gave up 50 yard plays you'd be bitching about that. -This is what happens when Goodell and Co. reward whiny little bitches for bitching. Yes, the non-PI call in NO was atrocious. No, that doesn't mean we should change the entire game because whiny fans booed. I'm glad they aren't overturning PI. Just get rid of the damn rule change and tell Payton to fuck off. I hear people say this about CBs being burned all of the time, however, almost EVERY time he has them pressing, guess what, they DON'T get burned. Sure, it happens but not all of the time, not even MOST of the time. But, when they play back, they almost ALWAYS get burned. Every time I see one of the two CBs (many times it's both) playing off, I call it, "He's throwing to x!" And almost every time, that's where the QB goes. So please, how is this better than occasionally getting burned for a long play? They're giving up chunks of yards on these plays. And, when you're 3rd and 5 or 10 or whatever, if you play the CBs off, then have them backpedal, you're just allowing them to catch the ball for a 1st down (or close) and, since the whole defense seems to have forgotten how to tackle, if they didn't make the 1st down, they have it and if they did make it, they pick up extra yards. Add to that, they either aren't coaching these guys up to NOT look in on the QB and go for every double move ever, or they're too friggin' stupid to stop trying to cheat on these plays. These are the times they get burned when covering full on man and pressing. It's just plain stupid. Been watching this for years and it's frustrating as hell. Just like that stupid fucking picket fence defense they play when 3rd/4th and long. About half the time they can't come up and make the tackle. So just let the CBs play already! If they get burned, so be it. But what they're doing obviously isn't working. I mean, Rodgers threw for 422 yards!!! He should have thrown for 500 yards but they had a big injury and he missed some throws late in the game. So, someone, please explain to me how this stupid concept of playing off receivers and backpedaling is helping.
|
|
|
Post by rumply on Sept 27, 2019 20:20:21 GMT -5
When the field is compressed, redzone, the secondary performs more than adequately, could say good even. What the Birds desperately need is that standout CB who can match it with oppositions best wideout. Until we have that Schwartz has to pick his poison - either give up easy yards over the top or give up easy yards underneath. At least yards underneath doesnt usually result in 6 points.
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 27, 2019 21:34:20 GMT -5
-Our DB's suck, and Rodgers was carving them up all night. If Adams is on the field all night we probably don't win. He has to play them back to give them a chance to not get burned. If he played press coverage and constantly gave up 50 yard plays you'd be bitching about that. -This is what happens when Goodell and Co. reward whiny little bitches for bitching. Yes, the non-PI call in NO was atrocious. No, that doesn't mean we should change the entire game because whiny fans booed. I'm glad they aren't overturning PI. Just get rid of the damn rule change and tell Payton to fuck off. I hear people say this about CBs being burned all of the time, however, almost EVERY time he has them pressing, guess what, they DON'T get burned. Sure, it happens but not all of the time, not even MOST of the time. But, when they play back, they almost ALWAYS get burned. Every time I see one of the two CBs (many times it's both) playing off, I call it, "He's throwing to x!" And almost every time, that's where the QB goes. So please, how is this better than occasionally getting burned for a long play? They're giving up chunks of yards on these plays. Did you watch the game last night, or were you too busy because NFL coaches were calling you for your opinion? Buddy, Maddox was pressing on the gigantic 58 yard play to Adams in the 1st quarter. Schwartz wisely chose to play him back after that. And guess what? His only other big play that game was on the play where Maddox slipped. Sure, he still ended up with a bunch of mid-range catches. Adams is a top-5 NFL receiver, and Rodgers IMO is the best QB in NFL history. He was always going to have a huge night - our DB's suck. They were simply completely overmatched, as they will be against good receiving corps this year. There's a youtube video of all Adams's catches. Go watch it. My beef was that Adams should've been double-teamed every now and then, and I don't recall seeing that. But no way in hell do I want Maddox pressing against anyone with more talent than Agholor. "If they get burned every now and then, so be it." Professional defensive coordinators don't have the luxury of being able to have that attitude - because if they do, they'll end up unemployed and watching the games with you. Schwartz has won a ring and he spends 80 hours a week with these guys. I'll trust his strategy.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 28, 2019 2:49:52 GMT -5
-Our DB's suck, and Rodgers was carving them up all night. If Adams is on the field all night we probably don't win. He has to play them back to give them a chance to not get burned. If he played press coverage and constantly gave up 50 yard plays you'd be bitching about that. -This is what happens when Goodell and Co. reward whiny little bitches for bitching. Yes, the non-PI call in NO was atrocious. No, that doesn't mean we should change the entire game because whiny fans booed. I'm glad they aren't overturning PI. Just get rid of the damn rule change and tell Payton to fuck off. I hear people say this about CBs being burned all of the time, however, almost EVERY time he has them pressing, guess what, they DON'T get burned. Sure, it happens but not all of the time, not even MOST of the time. But, when they play back, they almost ALWAYS get burned. Every time I see one of the two CBs (many times it's both) playing off, I call it, "He's throwing to x!" And almost every time, that's where the QB goes. So please, how is this better than occasionally getting burned for a long play? They're giving up chunks of yards on these plays. And, when you're 3rd and 5 or 10 or whatever, if you play the CBs off, then have them backpedal, you're just allowing them to catch the ball for a 1st down (or close) and, since the whole defense seems to have forgotten how to tackle, if they didn't make the 1st down, they have it and if they did make it, they pick up extra yards. Add to that, they either aren't coaching these guys up to NOT look in on the QB and go for every double move ever, or they're too friggin' stupid to stop trying to cheat on these plays. These are the times they get burned when covering full on man and pressing. It's just plain stupid. Been watching this for years and it's frustrating as hell. Just like that stupid fucking picket fence defense they play when 3rd/4th and long. About half the time they can't come up and make the tackle. So just let the CBs play already! If they get burned, so be it. But what they're doing obviously isn't working. I mean, Rodgers threw for 422 yards!!! He should have thrown for 500 yards but they had a big injury and he missed some throws late in the game. So, someone, please explain to me how this stupid concept of playing off receivers and backpedaling is helping. I agree 100%. The style of CB play is idiotic. They play a lot of good QBs this year who will eat them alive. Make the QB makevthectough throw. Give the DL that extra second. Another thing is that playing the way they do, always gives the QB an easy outlet throw. They go back to pass knowing that they have that outlet pass on the soft coverage. Take that away with in your face coverage and get the QB out of their consort zone. We need Ramsey now. This secondary is so bad that we aren't going anywhere. Injuries likely to make it worse but quite frankly, I can't see how James and Scandrick can't be an improvement over Maddox. Get him now ehilevwe have the extra days to get him up to speed.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 28, 2019 2:54:05 GMT -5
Hey Big Red,
Gotta disagree.
Schwartz won the big ring by giving up over 600 yards to NE.
His defensive game plan sucked that day.
I still think he is slightly above average DC, but give him zero credit for that SB win.
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 28, 2019 11:25:31 GMT -5
Hey Big Red, Gotta disagree. Schwartz won the big ring by giving up over 600 yards to NE. His defensive game plan sucked that day. I still think he is slightly above average DC, but give him zero credit for that SB win. You can agree with other fans, but the video and common sense agrees with me. Again, when pressing a top WR with a far inferior CB, he gave up a 60 yard play. Playing off prevented any further big plays, apart from the time Maddox slipped. Rodgers and Brady are arguably the 2 best QBs in history. Nobody gives a shit about yards as long as you win. If Belichick managed to pull that game out, do you think Boston fans would be going "ummm but Belichick gave up 500 yards to Nick Foles, fraud!" No. JJ didn't win shit with one of the best secondaries ever assembled. We have absolute trash apart from an elderly Jenkins, and won a damn Super Bowl, and just beat Rodgers in GB. He inherited one of the worst defenses in football, and we've made marked improvements in his time here. Again, with absolute shit DB's. He doesn't need your credit or your support, because people who actually know football knows what a good DC he is. And he's got the ring to prove it, by beating his old former mentor, considered the best coach in history by many. Now go get rick some more Doritos while you yell at the tv about how much he sucks.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 28, 2019 14:00:13 GMT -5
LOL.
First of all, the comment that I disagreed with was that he deserved credit for winning the SB.
If you live in a universe where giving up 600 yards and 33 points is a job well done, I need to visit that place. I hope the drugs are free!
I didn't rip him nearly as much as most. I didn't say he sucked. I said he was slightly above average. Not going to go overboard and rip him and say he sucks. Maybe he should pull some Jim Johnson napkins out of the old lockers so he can use a blitz that gets home for once. Samuel Morse would be proud.
You need to hold your heroes to higher standards.
BTW, I don't do Doritos. It's Cheese-its or Cheese Puffs. Get it right.
|
|
|
Post by gadgetrick on Sept 28, 2019 14:12:35 GMT -5
I hear people say this about CBs being burned all of the time, however, almost EVERY time he has them pressing, guess what, they DON'T get burned. Sure, it happens but not all of the time, not even MOST of the time. But, when they play back, they almost ALWAYS get burned. Every time I see one of the two CBs (many times it's both) playing off, I call it, "He's throwing to x!" And almost every time, that's where the QB goes. So please, how is this better than occasionally getting burned for a long play? They're giving up chunks of yards on these plays. Did you watch the game last night, or were you too busy because NFL coaches were calling you for your opinion? Buddy, Maddox was pressing on the gigantic 58 yard play to Adams in the 1st quarter. Schwartz wisely chose to play him back after that. And guess what? His only other big play that game was on the play where Maddox slipped. Sure, he still ended up with a bunch of mid-range catches. Adams is a top-5 NFL receiver, and Rodgers IMO is the best QB in NFL history. He was always going to have a huge night - our DB's suck. They were simply completely overmatched, as they will be against good receiving corps this year. There's a youtube video of all Adams's catches. Go watch it. My beef was that Adams should've been double-teamed every now and then, and I don't recall seeing that. But no way in hell do I want Maddox pressing against anyone with more talent than Agholor. "If they get burned every now and then, so be it." Professional defensive coordinators don't have the luxury of being able to have that attitude - because if they do, they'll end up unemployed and watching the games with you. Schwartz has won a ring and he spends 80 hours a week with these guys. I'll trust his strategy. Are you able to read or do we need to draw pictures? I understand what you're saying about giving up big plays. Ok, you have exactly ONE example of a big play when pressing. Also, I get it, you can get burned when pressing, however, more often than not, when they're pressing, a big play doesn't happen, in fact, even a short play doesn't normally happen. However, big plays (defined as giving up a first down or more) happen all of the time with this stupid way of playing CBs off 8 yards and having the backpedal. Regardless of all of this, the pass defense is absolutely HORRIBLE at this point. What they're doing isn't working. They're 2-2 and could very easily be 0-4 (could be 4-0 as well but not because of the defense). The defense is giving up 26+ points per game right now. What kind of record do you think they'll have if they continue to give up almost 30 points per game? Bottom line is, what they're doing isn't working. They've tried to protect the CBs for years by playing this stupid scheme playing them off. Nobody is arguing they need better CB play. But you cannot continue to give up 10-15 yard chunks of the field. They've played much better in the red zone. You think that may be because they can't backpedal as they'd be in the stands?
|
|
|
Post by gadgetrick on Sept 28, 2019 14:25:05 GMT -5
Hey Big Red, Gotta disagree. Schwartz won the big ring by giving up over 600 yards to NE. His defensive game plan sucked that day. I still think he is slightly above average DC, but give him zero credit for that SB win. You can agree with other fans, but the video and common sense agrees with me. Again, when pressing a top WR with a far inferior CB, he gave up a 60 yard play. Playing off prevented any further big plays, apart from the time Maddox slipped. Rodgers and Brady are arguably the 2 best QBs in history. Nobody gives a shit about yards as long as you win. If Belichick managed to pull that game out, do you think Boston fans would be going "ummm but Belichick gave up 500 yards to Nick Foles, fraud!" No. JJ didn't win shit with one of the best secondaries ever assembled. We have absolute trash apart from an elderly Jenkins, and won a damn Super Bowl, and just beat Rodgers in GB. He inherited one of the worst defenses in football, and we've made marked improvements in his time here. Again, with absolute shit DB's. He doesn't need your credit or your support, because people who actually know football knows what a good DC he is. And he's got the ring to prove it, by beating his old former mentor, considered the best coach in history by many. Now go get rick some more Doritos while you yell at the tv about how much he sucks. Funny that you keep bringing up one big play they gave up...ONE. I'll take giving up one or even TWO big plays over watching what they allow because of the scheme implemented by Schwartz. I don't say he sucks but I do say he refuses to ever make any adjustments. Remember against Dallas last year when he wouldn't either give help or put some else on Cooper while Cooper gashed us the whole game on the way to beating us? Or have you forgotten about that as well? One big play rarely costs a game. But lots of chunks of yardage given up, not being able to get off the field on defense do, in fact lose games. And sure, AR is a great QB. But there are LOTS of great QBs in the NFL they'll play. Also a lot of great WRs in the NFL they'll play. So what, exactly, is your point? You still have to play them. You still have to try and stop them. Currently, the defense isn't stopping anyone. Remember the first game against the Redskins? Sure, came out with a win but the defense did what they've done for the past few seasons...give up chunks of yards and hope to stop them in the red zone. That isn't going to work against the Patriots or the Chiefs or hell, even the Cowboys. Maybe you should go back and watch the times they pressed. More often than not, they did NOT give up big chunks of yards. As was pointed out, when you press, you don't give the QB an easy escape throw. They have to work for it. And by playing off and backpedaling, you put the CB in a HUGE disadvantage because he's backpedaling while the receiver he's covering is running at full speed (at times) and making breaks in front of you. Maybe, just maybe these CBs are better than we might think if they'd allow them to actually cover guys in a regular manner. Maybe not. When you press, if you chuck them off the line, the timing of the play gets messed up. Since a lot of plays are based on timing, this makes the QB have to go to 2nd or 3rd choices. This gives the D line a little more time to get to them. Add to this, the formula (since Schwartz got here) to beat our defense has been quick throws. It's absolutely IMPOSSIBLE to stop quick throws unless someone is fortunate enough to get a hand on the ball at the LOS if you're 8 yards off and already moving back at the snap of the ball. But you're right, let's keep letting them throw for 350-400+ yards on us each week and hope we can pull out a win in the end....
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 28, 2019 16:57:23 GMT -5
LOL. First of all, the comment that I disagreed with was that he deserved credit for winning the SB. If you live in a universe where giving up 600 yards and 33 points is a job well done, I need to visit that place. I hope the drugs are free! I didn't rip him nearly as much as most. I didn't say he sucked. I said he was slightly above average. Not going to go overboard and rip him and say he sucks. Maybe he should pull some Jim Johnson napkins out of the old lockers so he can use a blitz that gets home for once. Samuel Morse would be proud. You need to hold your heroes to higher standards. BTW, I don't do Doritos. It's Cheese-its or Cheese Puffs. Get it right. I live in a universe where winning the Super Bowl against the greatest dynasty in the history of the game with your backup QB is awesome. Brady and company are going to put up yards and points. The offense was great, and the defense did their job and made plays when they had to. The only team to really stuff the Pats' offense in the playoffs in recent memory was the Rams in the Super Bowl. Do you think Wade Philips goes around bragging about how his D only gave up 400 yards? Or do you think he'd rather give up the yards and win the damn game? Go watch the video of Adams's catches, it's right there in youtube. Right off the bat Maddox pressed and got burned for 58 yards. Afterwards, he played off and Adams was held to mid-range catches. The only other big play was when Maddox was playing off but slipped (remember, he sucks). The evidence is there, you just have to stop hating and look at it. It's the correct way to play our DB's right now. I'd like to see a few more blitzes too, and Maddox should've gotten more help. Perhaps with all the Packers' weapons Schwartz was uncomfortable with various matchups, as he should've been. But it's ridiculous to suggest a 3rd tier CB pressing a top-5 WR being thrown to by a HOF all-time QB is going to lead to anything other than disaster. And Cheese Puffs are gross, that orange shit gets all over your fingers. You're wrong about that too.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 29, 2019 7:56:37 GMT -5
Jim Schwartz, Eagles DC by the numbers:
Defensive Ranks (2019 is per games as of Friday)
Year, Points,Yards, TO forced 2019, 24th,22nd,16th 2018,12th,23rd,25th 2017,4th,4th,4th 2016,12rt, 13th, 10th
Avg, 13.0, 15.5, 13.75
In a 32 team league, that looks slightly above average to me.
If you would do an analysis of our Defensive performance versus Brady in the SB compared to all other defenses SB performances vs Brady in all his SB, I don't think we'd come close to being average.
Back to my Cheese Puffs........
|
|
|
Post by gadgetrick on Sept 29, 2019 8:59:10 GMT -5
LOL. First of all, the comment that I disagreed with was that he deserved credit for winning the SB. If you live in a universe where giving up 600 yards and 33 points is a job well done, I need to visit that place. I hope the drugs are free! I didn't rip him nearly as much as most. I didn't say he sucked. I said he was slightly above average. Not going to go overboard and rip him and say he sucks. Maybe he should pull some Jim Johnson napkins out of the old lockers so he can use a blitz that gets home for once. Samuel Morse would be proud. You need to hold your heroes to higher standards. BTW, I don't do Doritos. It's Cheese-its or Cheese Puffs. Get it right. I live in a universe where winning the Super Bowl against the greatest dynasty in the history of the game with your backup QB is awesome. Brady and company are going to put up yards and points. The offense was great, and the defense did their job and made plays when they had to. The only team to really stuff the Pats' offense in the playoffs in recent memory was the Rams in the Super Bowl. Do you think Wade Philips goes around bragging about how his D only gave up 400 yards? Or do you think he'd rather give up the yards and win the damn game? Go watch the video of Adams's catches, it's right there in youtube. Right off the bat Maddox pressed and got burned for 58 yards. Afterwards, he played off and Adams was held to mid-range catches. The only other big play was when Maddox was playing off but slipped (remember, he sucks). The evidence is there, you just have to stop hating and look at it. It's the correct way to play our DB's right now. I'd like to see a few more blitzes too, and Maddox should've gotten more help. Perhaps with all the Packers' weapons Schwartz was uncomfortable with various matchups, as he should've been. But it's ridiculous to suggest a 3rd tier CB pressing a top-5 WR being thrown to by a HOF all-time QB is going to lead to anything other than disaster. And Cheese Puffs are gross, that orange shit gets all over your fingers. You're wrong about that too. Umm, when you have a good/great receiver, you are correct, not a lot of CBs in the NFL will be able to cover them. However, Schwartz also doesn't like to double-team receivers. We saw it last year with Cooper and with other top receivers. So, pressing a receiver like that--with some help--would be a better option. Also, you seem to forget Adams went down late in the game after he'd already caught passed for 180 yards. Even if you take away the 58 yard reception, that's still REALLY bad and wasn't getting the job done. Had he not gotten hurt, there's a VERY good possibility GB would have (at least) tied the game. Also a good possibility they would have come back and won. Again, playing off and backpedalling didn't work. You seem to be missing the, "and backpedalling," part with what we're saying. You can't play off 8 yards and then back off at the snap of the ball and expect to stop anyone. Go ahead, watch the video of any game the Eagles have played this year. Watch how almost EVERY time there's a 3rd and 10ish they play the CBs off. The QB throws the ball to the receivers who aren't being covered until they get to about 12 yards down the field and, you guessed it! First down and maybe more since these guys can't tackle. You think the fact the defense can't get off the field won't affect them even more as the season goes on? Especially with the injuries now and they don't have the depth they had to start the season? You can't keep giving up 500-600 yards a game and expect to win many games. You also can't expect to do that and have the defense fresh enough to stop anyone as the season wears on. There is no argument the CBs they have aren't as good as we'd like but, when you play them back, and HAVE THEM BACKPEDAL, you aren't even giving them a chance to make a play. It's REALLY hard to backpedal, have a guy running at you, they make a move and accelerate to full speed, now your CB has to turn and then accelerate. The WR is already open and you have to try and catch up to make a play on the ball. Just not realistic to ask a CB to do that. Hell, the best CBs in the history of the game would have a difficult time covering people like that. Chuck the guy off the line, mess up their timing, have help for the better WR you're facing. Funny how teams all over the NFL do this all of the time--hell they do it to us!--and it seems to work for them even though there are only a small handful of GOOD CBs in the NFL right now.
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 29, 2019 13:02:54 GMT -5
Jim Schwartz, Eagles DC by the numbers: Defensive Ranks (2019 is per games as of Friday) Year, Points,Yards, TO forced 2019, 24th,22nd,16th 2018,12th,23rd,25th 2017,4th,4th,4th 2016,12rt, 13th, 10th Avg, 13.0, 15.5, 13.75 In a 32 team league, that looks slightly above average to me. If you would do an analysis of our Defensive performance versus Brady in the SB compared to all other defenses SB performances vs Brady in all his SB, I don't think we'd come close to being average. That's incredibly dishonest, to average in the year 2019 as a full season. But then again, if you were honest, you would hurt your own argument, so I can understand why you did that. Average of 9.33 in points allowed in the league over his 3 whole seasons. In a 32 team league, that's pretty damn good. 13.33 in yards allowed, which is above average. But remember, you win by scoring more points than the other team. I also think we would all agree our 2017-18 defense was by far his best personnel group. Again, he's done all this with a mostly horrible secondary. The days of watching Dawk, Vincent, Taylor, etc. were fun, but losing in the end isn't. You seem to be able to do your own research (albeit dishonestly), but off the top of my head I would point out that the 'average' is for teams to lose to Tom Brady in the playoffs and Super Bowl. Only we and the Giants have won. Their defensive efforts were better, but the key in both games was timely plays by Eli. It was the reverse for us - it's a team game. I love being a Philly sports fan, but we really do have a shitty fan base. Good god. This is like people who are still making excuses for Andy Reid while talking shit about Charlie Manuel.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 29, 2019 13:45:03 GMT -5
No,
A shitty fan base makes excuses for a slightly above average DC giving up 600 yards and 33 points in one of our 3 SB appearances.
A shitty fan base would PRAISE him for such a lame ass performance.
And no, I didn't and don't make excuses for Andy. Matter of fact, I was at that NE game at the Linc and in the section that started the Fi-Yer An Dee chants that spread to resonate throughout the stadium that day..
I'm Ok with Schwartz as our DC, but have no delusions of him being special.
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 29, 2019 14:17:43 GMT -5
No, A shitty fan base makes excuses for a slightly above average DC giving up 600 yards and 33 points in one of our 3 SB appearances. A shitty fan base would PRAISE him for such a lame ass performance. And no, I didn't and don't make excuses for Andy. Matter of fact, I was at that NE game at the Linc and in the section that started the Fi-Yer An Dee chants that spread to resonate throughout the stadium that day.. I'm Ok with Schwartz as our DC, but have no delusions of him being special. A shitty fan base manipulates stats dishonestly in order to tar a clearly well-above average DC who helped win them their only Super Bowl, as you did in your previous comment. Our defense kicked ass that year, and we shut down the Falcons and Vikings to get to the Super Bowl. Then we had a shootout game against the greatest dynasty in sports, with timely plays from the defense in securing the win. People who use the SUPER BOWL WIN to tar said DC are shitty fans. It's pathetic, but par for the course in Philly. I don't have to know you well to correctly guess you'd never tarnish JJ or Dawk, even though they frequently laid eggs in the playoffs and lost to the same QB and HC that Schwartz and Co. beat. I don't think Schwartz is 'special' either. But he's an excellent DC, as he has proven. At least you're right about Andy.
|
|
|
Post by nephillymike on Sept 29, 2019 15:46:48 GMT -5
This "Big Red" sounds familiar.
Been around these parts before ?
Admins, is he a returner with an alias?
BTW, if you didn't come up with the lame argument that he gets credit for the SB win, but instead said he deserves a lot of credit for getting us thru the playoffs TO the SB, you'd be right.
But you didn't.
You coulda been somebody.
As far as the stats lying. Why don't we wait until the end of the year so we have four full years to judge,
Sound like a plan?
|
|
|
Post by bigred on Sept 29, 2019 17:57:29 GMT -5
This "Big Red" sounds familiar. Been around these parts before ? Admins, is he a returner with an alias? BTW, if you didn't come up with the lame argument that he gets credit for the SB win, but instead said he deserves a lot of credit for getting us thru the playoffs TO the SB, you'd be right. But you didn't. You coulda been somebody. As far as the stats lying. Why don't we wait until the end of the year so we have four full years to judge, Sound like a plan? I'm flattered that I sound like other people you lost arguments to in the past. Maybe you should get your game up. He gets a lot of credit for us winning a ring. Pretty much any rational fan knows that. Stats don't lie - but people do. If you want to wait until the end of the year to add in his 4th season into his overall average here, feel free to do so. At least then it will be honest.
|
|